top of page
​
This page is under restructuration. Meanwhile, the following papers and drafts related to the project can be downloaded by clicking on the title (further materials will be uploaded soon):
​
“Is a unified conception of conspiracy theories possible?” (with Philippe Huneman), Argumenta, 3, 2 (2018), 247-270.
​
“Qu'est-ce qu'un doute raisonnable?”, forthcoming in Revue philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger, 2018 (3), 247-270 (uncorrected proofs).
​
“La valeur probante du témoignage: perspectives épistémologique et juridique”, Cahiers philosophiques, n°142, 2015, 21-52.
​
“The role of plausibility in acceptance of novel propositions: A challenge to Gilbert's 'Spinozan' theory of belief formation” (with Ulrike Hahn and Adam Harris), preregistration form.
​
“The story-model of jurors' reasoning and forensic evidence” (with David Lagnado and Saoirse Connor Desai), draft.
​
"The dilution effect: conversational basis and witness credibility” (with Jens Koed Madsen and Ulrike Hahn), CogSci 2017 Proceedings.
​
​
​
One major output, to date, has been the organisation of an interdisciplinary conference at Birkbeck College, London, May 4th-6th, entitled From Reasonable Doubt to Undue Scepticism. To learn more about it, and view some of the talks and discussions that took place, please visit the conference's website.
bottom of page